Ancients and Moderns

▪ literary dispute

      subject of a celebrated literary dispute that raged in France and England in the 17th century. The “Ancients” maintained that Classical literature of Greece and Rome offered the only models for literary excellence; the “Moderns” challenged the supremacy of the Classical writers. The rise of modern science tempted some French intellectuals to assume that, if René Descartes (Descartes, René) had surpassed ancient science, it might be possible to surpass other ancient arts. The first attacks on the Ancients came from Cartesian circles in defense of some heroic poems by Jean Desmarets de Saint-Sorlin (Desmarets de Saint-Sorlin, Jean) that were based on Christian rather than Classical mythology. The dispute broke into a storm with the publication of Nicolas Boileau (Boileau, Nicolas)'s L'Art poétique (1674), which defined the case for the Ancients and upheld the Classical traditions of poetry. From then on, the quarrel became personal and vehement. Among the chief supporters of the Moderns were Charles Perrault (Perrault, Charles) and Bernard de Fontenelle (Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bovier, sieur de). Supporters of the Ancients were Jean de La Fontaine (La Fontaine, Jean de) and Jean de La Bruyère (La Bruyère, Jean de).

      In England the quarrel continued until well into the first decade of the 18th century. In 1690 Sir William Temple (Temple, Sir William, Baronet), in his Essay upon Ancient and Modern Learning attacking the members of the Royal Society, rejected the doctrine of progress and supported the virtuosity and excellence of ancient learning. William Wotton (Wotton, Sir Henry) responded to Temple's charges in his Reflections upon Ancient and Modern Learning (1694). He praised the Moderns in most but not all branches of learning, conceding the superiority of the Ancients in poetry, art, and oratory. The primary points of contention were then quickly clouded and confused, but eventually two main issues emerged: whether literature progressed from antiquity to the present as science did, and whether, if there was progress, it was linear or cyclical. These matters were seriously and vehemently discussed. Jonathan Swift (Swift, Jonathan), defending his patron Temple, satirized the conflict in his Tale of a Tub (1704) and, more importantly, in The Battle of the Books (1704). At a later date Swift was to make an even more devastating attack on the Royal Society in Gulliver's Travels, Book III, “The Voyage to Laputa.”

* * *