Piltdown man

Piltdown man
/pilt"down'/
a hypothetical early modern human, assigned to the genus Eoanthropus, whose existence was inferred from skull fragments that were allegedly found at Piltdown, England, in 1912 but were exposed as fraudulent through chemical analysis in 1953.

* * *

▪ anthropological hoax
also called  Dawson's dawn man 
 proposed species of extinct hominin (member of the human lineage) whose fossil remains, discovered in England in 1910–12, were later proved to be fraudulent (fraud). Piltdown man, whose fossils were sufficiently convincing to generate a scholarly controversy lasting more than 40 years, was one of the most successful hoaxes in the history of science.

      In a series of discoveries in 1910–12, Charles Dawson, an English lawyer and amateur geologist, found what appeared to be the fossilized fragments of a cranium, a jawbone, and other specimens in a gravel formation at Barkham Manor on Piltdown Common near Lewes in Sussex. Dawson took the specimens to Arthur Smith Woodward, keeper of the British Museum's paleontology department, who announced the find at a meeting of the Geological Society of London on December 18, 1912. Woodward claimed that the fossils represented a previously unknown species of extinct hominin (Eoanthropus dawsoni) that could be the missing evolutionary link between apes and early humans. His claims were eagerly and uncritically endorsed by some prominent English scientists, perhaps because the Piltdown fossils suggested that the British Isles had been an important site of early human evolution.

      As long as the remains were accorded a high antiquity, Piltdown man seemed a feasible alternative to Homo erectus (then known from scanty remains as Pithecanthropus) as an ancestor of modern humans. In 1926, however, the Piltdown gravels were found to be much less ancient than supposed, and, from 1930, more finds of Pithecanthropus, the discoveries of the more primitive Australopithecus, and further examples of Neanderthal man left Piltdown man completely isolated in the evolutionary sequence. In 1953–54, as an outcome of these discoveries, an intensive scientific reexamination of the Piltdown remains showed them to be the skillfully disguised fragments of a quite modern human cranium (about 600 years old), the jaw and teeth of an orangutan, and the tooth probably of a chimpanzee, all fraudulently introduced into the shallow gravels. Chemical tests revealed that the fragments had been deliberately stained, some with chromium and others with acid iron sulfate solution (neither chromium nor sulfate occurs in the locality), and that, although the associated remains were of genuine extinct animals, they were not of British provenance. The teeth too had been subjected to artificial abrasion to simulate the human mode of flat wear.

      The exposure of the Piltdown fraud clarified the sequence of human evolution by removing the greatest anomaly in the fossil record. The fraud had impeded recognition of the importance of hominin fossils discovered in Africa.

      The identity of the perpetrator of the Piltdown hoax remains a mystery. Speculation has most often focused on Dawson himself, who may have been motivated by a desire for a coup that would gain him entrance into the Royal Society. Some scholars have contended that Woodward, Dawson's chief collaborator, was innocent, and others have suspected that he was the intended victim of the hoax (to make him look ridiculous upon exposure). Still others have contended that a friend of Dawson's, Samuel Woodhead, was a confederate, having access to bones and to chemicals for supplying and doctoring the specimens. Another possible participant in the scheme was Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre), a French Jesuit priest and paleontologist who accompanied Dawson on his first joint excavations at Piltdown with Woodward. Still other candidates have included the author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (Conan Doyle, Sir Arthur), who lived near Piltdown, knew Dawson, and was interested in fossils, and Sir Arthur Keith (Keith, Sir Arthur), who was an anatomist and conservator of the Hunterian Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons at the time.

      The first solid evidence regarding the identity of the perpetrator emerged in 1996, two decades after a trunk marked with the initials M.A.C.H. had been discovered in storage at the British Museum. Upon analyzing bones found in the trunk, the British paleontologists Brian Gardiner and Andrew Currant found that they had been stained in the exact same way as the Piltdown fossils. The trunk apparently had belonged to Martin A.C. Hinton, who became keeper of zoology at the British Museum in 1936. Hinton, who in 1912 was working as a volunteer at the museum, may have treated and planted the Piltdown bones as a hoax in order to ensnare and embarrass Woodward, who had rebuffed Hinton's request for a weekly wage. Hinton presumably used the bones in the steamer trunk for practice before treating the bones used in the actual hoax.

* * *


Universalium. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Piltdown man — [pilt′doun΄] n. a supposed species of prehistoric human presumed on the basis of skull fragments found in Piltdown (Sussex, England) about 1911 and exposed as a hoax in 1953 …   English World dictionary

  • Piltdown Man — Not to be confused with The Piltdown Men. Group portrait by John Cooke, 1915. Back row (from left): F O Barlow, G Elliot Smith, Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith Woodward. Front row: A S Underwood, Arthur Keith, W P Pycraft, and Sir Ray Lankester. The …   Wikipedia

  • Piltdown man — noun a supposedly primitive man later proven to be a hoax • Syn: ↑Piltdown hoax • Hypernyms: ↑primitive, ↑primitive person * * * Piltdown man [Piltdown man] a type of ↑ …   Useful english dictionary

  • Piltdown man — /ˈpɪltdaʊn mæn/ (say piltdown man) noun a supposedly very early form of the human species, Eoanthropus, whose existence was inferred from bone fragments found at Piltdown, Sussex, England in 1912; these were shown in 1953 to have been assembled… …  

  • Piltdown man — Pilt′down man [[t]ˈpɪltˌdaʊn[/t]] n. pan a hypothetical early modern human whose existence was inferred from bone fragments allegedly found at Piltdown, England, in 1912 but identified as a hoax in 1953 …   From formal English to slang

  • Piltdown man — noun Etymology: Piltdown, East Sussex, England Date: circa 1918 a supposedly very early hominid erroneously reconstructed from a combination of human and animal skeletal remains the latter of which were later found to have been planted by a… …   New Collegiate Dictionary

  • PILTDOWN MAN —    a skull discovered at Piltdown Common, England, between 1909 and 1915, and seemed to prove the truth of the THEORY of EVOLUTION. It was exposed as a clever forgery in 1953. The ROMAN CATHOLIC theologian Pierre TEILHARD DE CHARDIN appears to… …   Concise dictionary of Religion

  • Piltdown — Das Bild zeigt (von links) F. O. Barlow, Grafton Elliot Smith, Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith Woodward (stehend), Arthur Swayne Underwood, Arthur Keith, William Plane Pycraft und Ray Lankester (sitzend). Der Piltdow …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Piltdown-Mensch — 50.9876820.062727999999993 Koordinaten: 50° 59′ N, 0° 4′ O …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • man — n. 1) an average; fat; grown; handsome; middle aged; old; short; tall; thin; ugly; wise; young man 2) Cro Magnon; Heidelberg; Java; Neanderthal; Paleolithic; Peking; Piltdown man 3) a divorced; family; married; single man 4) a con, confidence;… …   Combinatory dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”