Lomborg, Bjorn

▪ 2004

      A long-running environmental controversy reached fever pitch in January 2003 when the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty ruled that a book challenging a number of widely held opinions was “clearly contrary to the standards of good scientific practice.” The book was The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjørn Lomborg, an associate professor in the department of political science at the University of Århus, Den. First published in 1998 as Verdens sande tilstand, the book became a best-seller in 2001 after Cambridge University Press published a revised and updated English translation.

      It all began when Lomborg, a committed Greenpeace environmentalist, read a magazine interview with Julian Simon, an economist renowned for his acerbic criticisms of environmentalism. Though Lomborg and his students sought to demolish Simon's analysis, they found that much of it was accurate. A professional statistician, Lomborg then embarked on an assessment of the proposition that the world is heading for ecological catastrophe. He called the oft-recited details of this supposed deterioration “the litany” and systematically demolished them in a book of more than 500 pages with 2,930 notes and references and a 71-page bibliography. The book was subjected to the standard peer-review procedure.

      Lomborg maintained that although the world faces many environmental problems, their severity is often exaggerated and the proposed remedies are inappropriate and often costly. He suggested that the money might be better invested in alleviating Third World poverty. As people became more prosperous, he wrote, they would be able to afford the technologies that would lead to environmental improvement.

      The Skeptical Environmentalist received a savage review in the journal Nature, and in November 2001 Lomborg learned that Scientific American planned to publish a feature on the book in January 2002. He asked the editor of the latter to allow him a reply in the same issue, but it was to no avail. He was finally allowed a small amount of space in the May issue to rebut attacks written by four outspoken environmentalists, two of whom he had criticized in his book. His full rebuttal appeared only on his own Web site, however.

      Four of his environmentalist opponents (two of the four who had contributed to the negative review in the Scientific American) referred the book to the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, and the committee's judgment was based primarily on the Scientific American articles. In April 2003 a Netherlands-based academic institution, Heidelberg Appeal the Netherlands, examined the judgment. It found that there were 27 accusations against Lomborg, of which only two minor ones might be justified. Meanwhile, Lomborg had lodged a formal complaint against the Danish Committee, and in December the Danish government overturned the committee's ruling.

      Lomborg was born on Jan. 6, 1965, in Copenhagen and grew up mainly in Ålborg. The first member of his immediate family to receive a university education, he earned a Ph.D. in 1994 from the University of Copenhagen. In February 2002 he was appointed director of Denmark's Environmental Assessment Institute, which seeks to obtain the greatest environmental benefit for money spent on environmental measures. He planned to return to academic life before the end of his five-year term.

Michael Allaby

* * *