- Müller, Johannes Peter
died April 28, 1858, Berlin, Ger.German physiologist, comparative anatomist, and natural philosopher.He studied at the Universities of Bonn and Berlin and later taught at both. His discovery that each sense organ responds to stimuli differently implied that external events are perceived only by the changes they produce in sensory systems. His investigations in physiology, evolution, and comparative anatomy contributed to knowledge of reflexes, the secretion and coagulation processes, the composition of blood and lymph, vision, and hearing. His studies of tumour cell structure began to establish pathological histology as a branch of science.
* * *▪ German physiologistborn July 14, 1801, Koblenz, Fr. [of the Consulate]died April 28, 1858, BerlinGerman physiologist (physiology) and comparative anatomist, one of the great natural philosophers of the 19th century. His major work was Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungen, 2 vol. (1834–40; Elements of Physiology).Müller was the son of a shoemaker. In 1819 he entered the University of Bonn, where the faculty of medicine was permeated with Naturphilosophie, which the young Müller eagerly espoused. He continued his studies at the University of Berlin, where he came under the influence of the sober, precise anatomist Karl Rudolphi and thereby freed himself from naturalistic speculation.In 1824 he was granted a lectureship in physiology and comparative anatomy at the University of Bonn. In his inaugural lecture, “Physiology, a science in need of a philosophical view of nature,” he outlined his approach to science and maintained that the physiologist must combine empirically established facts with philosophical thinking. Two years later he was appointed associate professor, and in 1830 he became a full professor.In the meantime, his voluminous Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes . . . (1826; “Comparative Physiology of the Visual Sense . . . ”) brought Müller to the attention of scholars by its wealth of new material on human and animal vision; he included the results of analyses of human expressions and research on the compound eyes of insects and crustaceans. His most important achievement, however, was the discovery that each of the sense organs responds to different kinds of stimuli in its own particular way or, as Müller wrote, with its own specific energy. The phenomena of the external world are perceived, therefore, only by the changes they produce in sensory systems. His findings had an impact even on the theory of knowledge.Müller's monograph “On Imaginary Apparitions” was also published in 1826. According to this theory the eye as a sensory system not only reacts to external optical stimuli but can also be excited by internal stimuli generated by the imagination. Thus, persons who report seeing religious visions, ghosts, or phantoms may actually be experiencing optical sensations and believe them to be of external origin, even though they do not in fact have an adequate external stimulus.Maintaining an almost incredible level of output at Bonn, he examined many problems in physiology, development, and comparative anatomy. He studied the passage of impulses from afferent nerves (going to the brain and spinal cord) to efferent nerves (going away from the same centres), further elucidating the concept of reflex action. By careful experiments on live frogs, he confirmed the law named after Charles Bell and François Magendie, according to which the anterior roots of the nerves originating from the spinal cord are motor and the posterior roots are sensory. He investigated the nervous system of lower animal species, the intricate structure of glands, and the process of secretion. When tracing the development of the genitalia, he discovered what is now known as the Müllerian duct, which forms the female internal sexual organs. He contributed to knowledge of the composition of the blood and lymph, the process of coagulation, the structure of lymph hearts of frogs, the formation of images on the retina of the eye, and the propagation of sound in the middle ear.In 1833 Müller was called to Berlin to succeed Rudolphi. In his new post he again carefully explored many problems concerning animal function and structure. His early years in Berlin were devoted mainly to physiology. His Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungen stimulated further basic research and became a starting point for the mechanistic concept of life processes, which was widely accepted in the second half of the 19th century.Inspired by the vast Berlin anatomical collection, Müller became interested again in pathology. After the demonstration by his assistant, Theodor Schwann, that the cell was the basic unit of structure in the animal body, he concentrated on the cellular structure of tumours with the aid of a microscope. In 1838 his work Über den feineren Bau und die Formen der krankhaften Geschwülste (On the Nature and Structural Characteristics of Cancer, and of Those Morbid Growths Which May Be Confounded with It) began to establish pathological (pathology) histology as an independent branch of science. Müller also distinguished himself as a teacher. His students included the renowned physiologist and physicist Hermann Helmholtz and the cellular pathologist Rudolf Virchow.Beginning in 1840 Müller increasingly focused his research on comparative anatomy and zoology, in so doing becoming one of the most respected scholars in these subjects. He was a master at collecting and classifying specimens; he devised an improved classification of fish and, based on an ingenious analysis of vocal organs, did the same for singing birds. For several years he concentrated on the lowest forms of marine vertebrates, the Cyclostomata and Chondrichthyes. He painstakingly described the structures and complex development of members of various classes of the invertebrate phylum Echinodermata. His last research activities were concerned with the marine protozoans Radiolaria and Foraminifera.In 1827, 1840, and 1848, Müller suffered periods of depression that rendered him incapable of working for months on end. They may perhaps be attributed—as his periods of explosive productivity—to a manic-depressive disposition. It may also be regarded as the cause of his death in 1858. Some scholars have concluded that he died by his own hand.Johannes SteudelAdditional ReadingUlrich Ebecke, Johannes Müller, der grosse rheinische Physiologe (1951), includes a new edition of Müller's work Über die phantastischen Gesichtserscheinungen. See also Gottfried Koller, Das Leben des Biologen Johannes Müller 1801–1858 (1958), a biography that does justice to Müller's zoological achievements; Johannes Steudel, Le Physiologiste Johannes Müller (1963), a brief biography; and Walther Riese and George E. Arrington, Jr., “The History of Johannes Mueller's Doctrine of the Specific Energies of the Senses: Original and Later Versions,” Bull. Hist. Med., 37:179–183 (1963).
* * *