logarithm

/law"geuh ridh'euhm, -rith'-, log"euh-/, n. Math.

the exponent of the power to which a base number must be raised to equal a given number; log: 2 is the logarithm of 100 to the base 10 (2 = log₁₀ 100).

[1605-15; < NL logarithmus < Gk lóg(os) LOG- + arithmós number; see ARITHMETIC]

* * *

In mathematics, the power to which a base must be raised to yield a given number (e.g., the logarithm to the base 3 of 9, or log₃ 9, is 2, because 3² = 9).

A common logarithm is a logarithm to the base 10. Thus, the common logarithm of 100 (log 100) is 2, because 10² = 100. Logarithms to the base e, in which e = 2.71828..., called natural logarithms (ln), are especially useful in calculus. Logarithms were invented to simplify cumbersome calculations, since exponents can be added or subtracted to multiply or divide their bases. These processes have been further simplified by the incorporation of logarithmic functions into digital calculators and computers. See also John Napier.

* * *

▪ mathematics

Introduction

      the exponent or power to which a base must be raised to yield a given number. Expressed mathematically, x is the logarithm of n to the base b if b^x = n, in which case one writes x = log_b n. For example, 2³ = 8; therefore, 3 is the logarithm of 8 to base 2, or 3 = log₂ 8. In the same fashion, since 10² = 100, then 2 = log₁₀ 100. Logarithms of the latter sort (that is, logarithms with base 10) are called common, or Briggsian, logarithms and are written simply log n.

      Invented in the 17th century to speed up calculations, logarithms vastly reduced the time required for multiplying numbers with many digits. They were basic in numerical work for more than 300 years, until the perfection of mechanical calculating machines in the late 19th century and computers in the 20th century rendered them obsolete for large-scale computations. The natural, or Napierian, logarithm (with base e  2.71828 and written ln n), however, continues to be one of the most useful functions in mathematics, with applications to mathematical models (mathematical model) throughout the physical and biological sciences.

Properties of logarithms

 Logarithms were quickly adopted by scientists because of various useful properties that simplified long, tedious calculations. In particular, scientists could find the product of two numbers m and n by looking up each number's logarithm in a special table, adding the logarithms together, and then consulting the table again to find the number with that calculated logarithm (known as its antilogarithm). Expressed in terms of common logarithms, this relationship is given by log mn = log m + log n. For example, 100 × 1,000 can be calculated by looking up the logarithms of 100 (2) and 1,000 (3), adding the logarithms together (5), and then finding its antilogarithm (100,000) in the table. Similarly, division problems are converted into subtraction problems with logarithms: log m/n = log m − log n. This is not all; the calculation of powers and roots can be simplified with the use of logarithms. Logarithms can also be converted between any positive bases (except that 1 cannot be used as the base since all of its powers are equal to 1), as shown in the table—> of logarithmic laws.

      Only logarithms for numbers between 0 and 10 are typically included in logarithm tables. To obtain the logarithm of some number outside of this range, the number must first be written in scientific notation as the product of its significant digits and its exponential power—for example, 358 would be written as 3.58 × 10², and 0.0046 would be written as 4.6 × 10⁻³. Then the logarithm of the significant digits—a decimal fraction between 0 and 1, known as the mantissa—can be found in a table. Finally, the integer exponential power, known as the characteristic of the logarithm, is appended before the decimal point to give the logarithm of the original number. However, when this integer is negative, the minus sign is omitted and a bar is placed over it to distinguish it from the positive mantissa. For example, to find the logarithm of 0.0046, one would look up log 4.6  0.6628 and then write log 0.0046  3.6628.

History of logarithms

      The invention of logarithms was foreshadowed by the comparison of arithmetic and geometric sequences. In a geometric sequence each term forms a constant ratio with its successor; for example,

…1/1,000, 1/100, 1/10, 1, 10, 100, 1,000…

has a common ratio of 10. In an arithmetic sequence each successive term differs by a constant, known as the common difference; for example,

…−3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3…

has a common difference of 1. Note that a geometric sequence can be written in terms of its common ratio; for the example geometric sequence given above:

…10⁻³, 10⁻², 10⁻¹, 10⁰, 10¹, 10², 10³….

Multiplying two numbers in the geometric sequence, say 1/10 and 100, is equal to adding the corresponding exponents of the common ratio, −1 and 2, to obtain 10¹ = 10. Thus, multiplication is transformed into addition. The original comparison between the two series, however, was not based on any explicit use of the exponential notation; this was a later development. In 1620 the first table based on the concept of relating geometric and arithmetic sequences was published in Prague by the Swiss mathematician Joost Bürgi (Bürgi, Joost).

      The Scottish mathematician John Napier (Napier, John) published his discovery of logarithms in 1614. His purpose was to assist in the multiplication of quantities that were then called sines. The whole sine was the value of the side of a right-angled triangle with a large hypotenuse. (Napier's original hypotenuse was 10⁷.) His definition was given in terms of relative rates.

The logarithme, therefore, of any sine is a number very neerely expressing the line which increased equally in the meene time whiles the line of the whole sine decreased proportionally into that sine, both motions being equal timed and the beginning equally shift.

      In cooperation with the English mathematician Henry Briggs (Briggs, Henry), Napier adjusted his logarithm into its modern form. For the Naperian, or natural, logarithm the comparison would be between points moving on a graduated straight line, the L point (for the logarithm) moving uniformly from minus infinity to plus infinity, the X point (for the sine) moving from zero to infinity at a speed proportional to its distance from zero. Furthermore, L is zero when X is one and their speed is equal at this point. The essence of Napier's discovery is that this constitutes a generalization of the relation between the arithmetic and geometric series; i.e., multiplication and raising to a power of the values of the X point correspond to addition and multiplication of the values of the L point, respectively. In practice it is convenient to limit the L and X motion by the requirement that L = 1 at X = 10 in addition to the condition that X = 1 at L = 0. This change produced the Briggsian, or common, logarithm.

      Napier died in 1617 and Briggs continued alone, publishing in 1624 a table of logarithms calculated to 14 decimal places for numbers from 1 to 20,000 and from 90,000 to 100,000. In 1628 the Dutch publisher Adriaan Vlacq brought out a 10-place table for values from 1 to 100,000, adding the missing 70,000 values. Both Briggs and Vlacq engaged in setting up log trigonometric tables. Such early tables were either to one-hundreth of a degree or to one minute of arc. In the 18th century, tables were published for 10-second intervals, which were convenient for seven-decimal-place tables. In general, finer intervals are required for calculating logarithmic functions of smaller numbers—for example, in the calculation of the functions log sin x and log tan x.

      The availability of logarithms greatly influenced the form of plane and spherical trigonometry. The procedures of trigonometry were recast to produce formulas in which the operations that depend on logarithms are done all at once. The recourse to the tables then consisted of only two steps, obtaining logarithms and, after performing computations with the logarithms, obtaining antilogarithms.

Francis J. Murray

* * *